Posted by MikeCP
On Friday, Google posted an update on its Webmaster Central weblog entitled "Providing More Advice on Building High-Quality Internet sites". The piece expands on significantly of what Google has stated about the Panda update since its original release on February 24th.
In public statements about the Panda update, Google has referenced a number of queries that they’re attempting to answer algorithmically. "Would you feel comfy giving your credit card information to this website?" and "Would you accept health-related advice from this web site?" are two that have been around since the starting. Friday’s Webmaster Central publish presented up a much more substantial listing with some of the highlights under:
- Does the site have duplicate, overlapping, or redundant posts on the same or related topics with slightly various key phrase versions?
- Does this article have spelling, stylistic, or factual errors?
- Are the topics driven by genuine interests of visitors of the site, or does the site make content material by trying to guess what may possibly rank well in lookup engines?
- Does the post supply original content or info, authentic reporting, original study, or authentic analysis?
- Is the website a recognized authority on its subject?
- Is the subject material mass-developed by or outsourced to a significant quantity of creators, or spread across a significant network of websites, so that individual pages or sites don&rsquot get as significantly attention or care?
- Is this the kind of web page you&rsquod want to bookmark, share with a pal, or recommend?
- Does this write-up have an abnormal quantity of advertisements that distract from or interfere with the principal subject material?
- Would end users complain when they see pages from this internet site?
- Would you be at ease providing your credit score card details to this internet site?
Along with the set of questions, Google’s Amit Singhal also additional:
One other particular piece of guidance we’ve provided is that reduced-quality content material on some components of a web site can effect the total website&rsquos rankings, and as a result taking away very low good quality pages, merging or improving the content material of person shallow pages into far more useful pages, or moving reduced top quality pages to a various domain could ultimately help the rankings of your higher-high quality material.
Answering the "Feeling" Questions
We can deduce how Google can algorithmically solution very a few of the concerns (Richard Baxter did just that in a excellent post), but what about those "feeling" concerns, like the credit card query? It’s challenging to say, but really obtaining most of the concerns answered about your site may possibly supply some useful feedback. If you’re an in-house Search engine optimization for a internet site that has been punished, perhaps one particular of the following services can be employed to assist a claim for a redesign or some other modify in internet site philosophy.
Mechanical Turk/FeedbackArmy
.gif)
The most inexpensive and most scalable way to get this feedback would have to be by means of Mechanical Turk. If you haven’t utilised the service, mturk permits you to break a project down into mini duties that mturk’s end users will total for sometimes as reduced as 1 penny.
Let us suppose our activity is for the consumer to go to the site in question, then reply one particular of our "feeling" queries. It would get no a lot more than a moment of a Turkers time, so a fair price would possibly be close to 10 cents. Set your task to run until finally you have got fifty solutions, and for $ five.00 you have received 50 responses to your question. For another $ 5.00 you can inquire Turkers to pay a visit to a competing site and consult the same query, enabling you to evaluate the final results among the two sites.
FeedbackArmy is yet another selection that would work. Think of FeedbackArmy as a front-finish for Mechanical Turk, as they both use the Turk workforce. You are going to end up spending a bit a lot more than if you dealt straight with Mechanical Turk, but the setup approach is significantly simpler.
UserTesting
UserTesting is a greater-finish feedback solution. For $ 39 you will get a video clip of a user interacting with your site. UserTesting enables you to inquire the person up to four inquiries right after they’ve finished the feedback video, which would be a perfect spot to request some of our Panda questions. 
Other Panda Odds and Ends
NPR did a story on Panda’s effect on one particular company’s struggle given that obtaining Panda-fied: Google’s lookup tweaks puts a firm at chance
Matt Cutts quote from that story:
Believe about some thing like an Apple item, when you acquire an Apple product you open it up, the box is stunning, the packaging is stunning, the complete experience is genuinely amazing.
It seems to me that this statement is genuinely just one more way of stating "large quantities of duplicated or poor content material on your website can impact the entire domain".
Reversing the Effects of Panda
Tom Critchlow had this exchange with Matt Cutts on Twitter:
 
 
Moral of this tale: Really don’t anticipate rankings to occur appropriate back following generating modifications. This is a little annoying simply because site owners cannot make a modify, wait to see if the alter "worked", then try out one thing else. It also may clarify why there have been so few reports of internet sites regaining their site visitors.
A 3rd Panda Spotted?
Rumors picked up in early Could that a third Panda update may possibly have gone stay. End users ended up reporting wild fluctuations in rankings and other oddities in the Google cache and web site search commands. Thinking about what Matt Cutts explained above, it tends to make sense for Panda updates to hit suddenly and all at once, rather than more than a period of time of time. Some are reporting that their precise match domains took a hit.
So our Panda timeline now reads:
- Feb 24th, 2011: Panda rollout on Google.com searches
- April 11th, 2011: Panda rollout to all English talking Google web sites. Further tweaks created to authentic algorithm
- May possibly three-6th, 2011: 3rd Panda update?
 
Have you noticed any traffic alterations during this time frame? Have any of your web sites recovered from in the beginning becoming Panda-fied?
Do you like this post? Yes No

SEOmoz Everyday Seo Website